Reference values for the water load test in healthy school children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The water load test (WLT) is an easy and cheap tool, useful in evaluating gastric accommodation and visceral hypersensitivity. This test can be used in diagnosing functional gastrointestinal disorders, like functional dyspepsia. Our main aim was to propose reference values for the WLT. Our secondary aim was to correlate the water volume drunk with the students' gender, age, and anthropometric measures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed the WLT in students aged 8 to 17 years. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 minutes or until pain, satiety or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. Upper and lower limit for the maximum tolerated volume were calculated as the 5th and 95th percentile. Pain and nausea were recorded before and after the test. RESULTS: We evaluated 99 students, with a median age (inter quartile range) of 11 years 10-13 years) and 55.6 % were girls. Median water volume drank was 380 ml (190-540 ml). Boys (523 ml, interquartile range : 275-760 ml) drank more water than girls (380 ml, interquartile range : 190-570 ml) (p = 0.016). There was a significant correlation between water volume drank and students´ age, weight, height, and body mass index. Of the students that completed the WLT, 22.2 % had nausea and 30.3 % had mild abdominal pain after the test. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed reference values for the WLT in children aged 8 to 17 years. Adverse effects are minimal, it is safe to perform, and well tolerated.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: An Approach Proposal and Update on Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

BK virus belongs to Polyomaviridae family; it causes 95% of nephropathy cases related to polyomavirus, with the other 5% caused by JC virus. Nephropathy jeopardizes graft function, causing a premature failure of the graft in 1%-10% of patients with kidney transplants. Nowadays, antiviral effective treatment is unknown, which is why blood and urine screening of renal transplantation patients has become the most important recommendation to guide the decrease of immunosuppression, and the only proven method to decrease poor outcomes. Different interventions, such as cidofovir, leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, and intravenous immunoglobulin, have been attempted with no improvement at all. This review aims to summarize the most relevant features of BK virus, historical issues, transmission mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic interventions.

Diabetes mellitus and renal transplantation in adults: is there enough evidence for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation?

BACKGROUND: New-onset diabetes after renal transplantation (NODAT) is one of the most frequent metabolic complications after transplantation; it is present in ∼25% of kidney transplant recipients, increasing their cardiovascular risk and inducing graft damage. The medical approach of this entity is still a matter of controversy, so our aim was to review the evidence available and offer a practical approach for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature in the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases was carried out with the use of the terms "Diabetes Mellitus," "Kidney Transplantation," "Drug Therapy," "Prognosis," "Therapeutics," and "Risk Factors." Randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies were included. RESULTS: The main risk factors were elevated body mass index, family history of diabetes, recipient >60 years old, hepatitis C virus infection, and treatment with tacrolimus/corticosteroids or sirolimus. Some small studies suggest that thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, glinides, and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors could be useful in the treatment of the disease. NODAT constitutes a prognostic factor for the renal transplant. Although there is a higher risk of developing diabetes in kidney transplant recipients than in the general population, both populations share the same diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus on the treatment regimen for these patients. It is necessary to review the diagnostic criteria and the screening methods for NODAT, given the higher susceptibility of kidney transplant recipients to develop this entity; therefore, an earlier intervention could be implemented to decrease the negative effects that this disease has on the kidney graft and the recipient.